Skip to main content

Vaccination jabs: Whither David to challenge the blind Goliath, WHO-pharma coalition?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* 

Indians are not expected to question their Guru. Since student days medical and para-medicals revere the World Health Organization (WHO) as the ultimate Guru concerning health issues. In Western universities, students are expected to challenge their Gurus and engage their teachers in debate. In Asian traditions, the teacher is Guru, the all knowing God. Challenging the Guru is blasphemy.
This attitude is an extension of our patriarchal and authoritarian societies. The head of the family is always right and all are expected to conform. Outside the cozy comfort of the family people seek an authority figure or Guru to make important decisions them. Most often this emotional vacuum is filled by the Government, the "Sarkar." or institutions like the WHO in matters of health.
While Indians enjoy a democracy and in principle have individual rights and autonomy, their surrender to a Guru, be it the government or the WHO, unconditionally, can have serious consequences if these institutions turn into Goliaths. Since my college days, I have retained a bit of irreverence essential for critical thinking, which makes me challenge the ultimate health Guru.
But why challenge, one may ask? Wasn't Goliath all powerful? Shouldn't being on his side protect us from all adversities? Reinterpretation of the tale of Goliath brings out many chinks in his armour. An aging Guru, whom we worship but never challenge, can be a handicap.
In the Biblical legend, Goliath is gigantic with full armour, epitomizing strength backed by unlimited wealth. David, on the other hand is a small lowly shepherd boy carrying a stick and a sling who dared to take on the challenge of fighting the mighty Goliath. In the ensuing contest to the amazement of all, David with his nimbleness, flexibility and adaptability brings down the clumsy, groping, Goliath by a sharp stone thrown from his sling.
It is common belief that Goliath, with his size and heavy armour, had the advantage in this unequal combat and David's victory over Goliath was a fluke against all odds. Counterview to this is offered by Malcolm Gladwell based on published research. Scientific and theological investigations have unearthed many fascinating facts around the clash between David and Goliath.
A peer reviewed paper by Dierdee Donnelly and Patrick Morrison, titled, "Hereditary Gigantism" -- the Biblical Goliath and his brothers, published in Ulster Medical Journal in 2014, concludes that Goliath suffered from acromegaly caused by a tumour of the pituitary gland at the base of the brain. This condition increases the secretion of the growth hormone which leads to gigantism.
The tumour also presses on the optic nerve which carries visual images from the eyes to the brain and can lead to severe nearsightedness. Goliath is blind is evident in the biblical story as he has to be led by hand to the contest. The giant Goliath is also bogged down by his cumbersome armour rendering his movements clumsy and slow. David while far diminutive in size has the advantage of speed and flexibility. Using this to his advantage he knocked down Goliath with an accurate throw from his sling.
Lessons from this legend are applicable to the current state of the WHO and their health strategists. Remarkable advances in medical technology have transformed medicine to "gigantic" or "acromegalous" heights like a modern Goliath. The accompanying costs and challenges have made the diminutive Davids in independent private practice give way to big corporate hospitals transforming medicine from a calling to big business. The transformed WHO in its new avatar as a blind Goliath is led by the hand by the poster boys of pharmaceutical industry!
The sheer size and gigantic visibility of the WHO-Pharma coalition standing tall as a present day Goliath has stirred unrealistic expectations among populations particularly the elite and middle classes that every ill has a pill and every infection has a jab, the more the better. No doubt medical advances have led to remarkable improvements in health of people. But like in the case of the legendary Goliath the vision and flexibility have diminished.
The pandemic has exposed the chinks in the armour of this Goliath. Faced with a nimble, virus it groped and lunged clumsily to vanquish the enemy, tiny both in size and impact. The awkward myopic movements of this giant trampled upon lives and livelihoods across the globe, destroying businesses and fracturing society trying to check an infection which has a survival rate of 99.9%.
The giant failed to adapt itself to accumulating evidence. It kept on persisting with the blanket restrictive measures for all when data clearly indicated that the novel virus was lethal mostly in the elderly with comorbidities.
The blind Goliaths lost their focus. Instead of focused protection of the non-immune, mass vaccination campaigns are being rolled out even in populations where over 80% have acquired natural immunity. The superiority of naturally acquired immunity (13 to 27 times more robust than vaccine induced immunity) was known since ages and confirmed in the pandemic as well.
A wise Guru should encourage critical thinking instead of censoring opposing views. Time to challenge the Guru who has turned into a blind Goliath
This fundamental fact is being downplayed by the modern Goliaths like the WHO and the CDC in the blind unholy haste to push vaccines to all whether immune or not, including, horror of horrors, children with immunity – innate as well as naturally acquired. A Nelson's eye is being turned to population level surges even after high vaccination coverage and boosters in countries like Israel, Singapore, South Korea and others.
The blind, clumsy and aging Goliath has not lost the hunger for power. A proposed pandemic treaty will give immense arbitrary powers to WHO which can declare a "pandemic" on whim and fancy, endangering the autonomy of world governments.
Regional factors drive any pandemic beyond human interventions. One size fit all treaty defies all epidemiological principles. Management of pandemics should be done by local experts, the Davids, who have insight of the epidemiological nuances of the region. Blanket treaties is not fair to the WHO or to countries facing pandemics differently in different regions.
A wise Guru should encourage debate and critical thinking instead of censoring opposing views. Time to come of age and challenge the Guru who has turned into a blind Goliath! Towards this end a group of epidemiologists, data scientists, doctors with support of activists, lawyers and civil society has launched the Universal Health Organization (UHO). The aim of this organization is to engage the WHO and other modern Goliaths to collaborate and not confront or censor, not to knock down the giant but knock down unscientific messages and practices which can harm humanity.
Like David this diminutive organization will challenge the blind Goliaths to scientific debates in place of physical combat, whenever they stray from the path of science and integrity to promote, "transparency, empowerment and accountability." The UHO website is active and accessible here.
__
*Post Doctoral in Epidemiology, presently Professor at Dr DY Patil Medical College, Pune; formerly field epidemiologist for 20 years in the Indian Armed Forces and headed the Mobile Epidemic Investigation Team at the Armed Forces Medical College from 2000 to 2004

Comments

MKR said…
True. One fact that is being overlooked is that the spike protein being introduced is a toxin, is lab made n patented in USA n there is no way of confirming that a portion of it does not get to circulate in our blood stream simply because it is encapsulated in lipid nano particles. Science dies not work without rigorous tests n retests. All safety tests were never completed . Tests for sterility , for genotoxicity , for carcogencity nit done. Are we not playing with one billion lines ?

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”