Climate change: Dangerous radicals are everywhere... direct and to the point

By Shankar Sharma*
The latest edition of a magazine “Climate News” has a few interesting items. It is interesting to note what the UN Secretary General is reported to have stated:
“Countries that are increasing production of fossil fuels are ‘dangerous radicals’. That was António Guterres’ take on the latest UN climate science report..”
This is pretty direct and to the point. Even a global diplomat such as the UN Secretary General seems to have run out of patience with various country governments. Anyone with sensitivity towards global welfare can only be expected to feel so frustrated. Which countries he was referring to? It should be pretty obvious India must have been one of the few countries at the top of his list of such dangerous radicals.
Our MoEF&CC was reported to have resorted to patting itself on its own back by alluding that the recent IPCC report has appreciated India’s efforts. The UN Secretary General’s statement seems to sum up the scenario a lot better.
Now the question is: since India also has signed off on the latest IPCC report, can we expect MoEF&CC to come with a point wise response to every recommendation of relevance to India?
Whereas many of the environmentalists have been advocating much higher focus on Demand Side Management (DSM) for many years, it is probably the first time that a credible global agency such as IPCC has provided emphasis on DSM. 40-70% cut in emissions is projected to be feasible by DSM alone, as per IPCC. Is it not very striking? It should also mean much less pressure on land, forests, fresh water sources, materials, pollution/ contamination with cascading positive effects on human health. What else is needed from the overall welfare perspective of human kind?
According to IPCC WGIII, The emissions cuts that could be achieved by reducing energy demand across all sectors by 2050 compared with projections based on current policies is 40-70%.
—
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo* A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Counterview

Search This Blog