Skip to main content

NREGA implementation: 'Unsatisfactory' social audit across States, Govt of India told

Counterview Desk 

The civil rights group, NREGA Sangharsh Morcha, advocating proper implementation of India’s premier rural jobs guarantee scheme, has regretted that standards of social audits for implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which should be based on Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) directions, “are largely unsatisfactory”.
In a letter to Union rural development minister Giriraj Singh, with a copy to Nagendra Nath Sinha, secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, the Morcha said, Most Social Audit Units (SAUs) have stopped regular audits since April 2021.

Text:

NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM) is a people’s campaign for right to work with dignity and social security, a collective of rural people’s organisations, women’s organisations and workers’ unions. The campaign has deep grass-roots presence and work on NREGA on a day to day basis. We observe the programme closely across different States and advocate for improved and transparent implementation of the same.
We write to you to convey our observations on the status of social audits and put forward recommendations for executing Social Audits with letter and spirit, across the nation.
The norms based on which social audits of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) must take place are clearly determined in the auditing standards of social audit, as laid down by the Comptroller General of India. However, we have observed that the standards of audits and action taken on audit findings are largely unsatisfactory across states.
Our observations are as follows:
  1. Social Audit Units (SAUs) have been set up in all states of the country. However, The SAUs, in most states, are not independent, They do not have sufficient staff and have not been allocated adequate funds. In some states (e.g: Uttar Pradesh), the officials from the Programme Implementing Agencies (PIAs) are responsible for oversight and payments of local SAU cadres.
  2. The quality of audits vary widely across the states. Also, appropriate and timely follow up action has not been taken and uploaded on the website. It has been often observed that issues are being closed by PIA without any independent oversight.
  3. Most SAUs have stopped regular audits, since April 2021. A few SAUs have taken up concurrent audits but on a smaller scale. However, the findings of these concurrent audits are placed in the public domain as the Management Information System (MIS) has not been extended to accommodate the entry of concurrent audit data.
  4. All social audit reports are not hosted in the public domain. In FY 2019-20, while audits have been done in 51 percent of GPs, the audit findings have been disclosed in the public domain only for 37 per cent of the audits. Also, Action Taken Reports (ATRs) of the department that enlist the action taken on social audit findings are not disclosed in the public domain.
  5. Several media outlets have indicated heavy misappropriation in NREGA funds as reported by different SAUs in the last four years. However, our observations are that the volume of misappropriation is much more than what is reported in audits since audits are not regularly held, in most states each gram panchayat goes through the process of audit once in three years and in some states audits do not happen at all.
The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha therefore demands:
  • The Central Government should ensure provision of adequate funds to SAUs for social audits to take place as per calendar.
  • The Central government and State governments should ensure that all directors and staff of SAUs shall be appointed as per the auditing standards of social audit to ensure independence of the unit. The programme implementing agency should have absolutely no interference in the operations of the SAUs.
  • The Ministry should intervene to ensure that SAUs upload the social audit calendars in the public domain and social audits are executed as per the same. There is a need for independent oversight in this regard.
  • The Ministry should ensure that social audit reports are uploaded in the public domain within seven days of completion of social audit public hearing. The findings of the concurrent audits should also get uploaded on the website and the Centre should make mandatory provisions on the official website for the same.
  • The Central government should instruct and ensure that the State governments fill in ATRs on social audit findings within a period of 30 days, and the same is disclosed in the public domain. The Centre should have a stringent follow-up mechanism to ensure on-time action on irregularities.
We expect a quick action from your end on these issues to ensure that independent social audits are regularized in all states, findings are put in public domain and timely actions are ensured against each irregularity.

Comments

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.