Skip to main content

Govt of India's fresh 'experiments' add to delay in payments to NREGA workers

By Debmalya Nandy*

The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) payments process has become no less than a technical conundrum which has not only resulted into workers’ predicaments but also diminished local accountability. The payments process is such that the workers will have no one to hold accountable for when their payments get delayed or in case of non-payments.
It has not only become an agonizing compulsion for the workers to work and then hopelessly wait for payments for a long time, but the centralized process has burdened local Panchayati Raj Representatives, who have no power to solve for the issues of payments.
The NREGA payments system is divided into two stages by the Centre. The payments generation stage at the local level is defined as stage-1 and the release of payments by the central government to the worker’s bank account is termed as stage-2.
Stage 1 comprises of different processes at the local level and is a responsibility of the local administration. In stage 1, the filled muster rolls (daily attendance sheets of the workers) need to be entered in the Management Information System [MIS] and collated in the form of a “wage list”( worker wise wage payment information) and several such wage lists are collated into different fund transfer orders (FTO) for processing of payments in different batches.
Subsequently the fund transfer orders need to be digitally signed by the authorized signatories. In most states panchayat secretaries are the first signatory while the second signatory is the Block Development officer. However, many states have also authorized panchayat heads (mukhia or sarpanch) as second signatories (which means they have the authority to sanction payments).
Once the FTO is digitally signed by the two authorized signatories, the stage-1 of payments processing system ends and stage-2 begins. In stage-2, the Central government requires to process the fund transfer orders from their end using National Electronic Finance Management System (NEFMS) through a single bank, directly to the workers account.
The central website shows that bulk of the payments are “generated” within 15 days. Which practically means that the stage-1 processes are being completed within 15 days. However, as per the Act, the entire payments process needs to be done within 15 days from the end date of the muster roll and the workers should get their payments within these 15 days.
Currently as on 7th September, 43% of Payments for the month of August are pending from the Central government as per the Report No R.8.8.1 in the official website, which involves about Rs.2846cr of wages but the same website shows that 99% payments have been “generated” on time.
Time and again the government has been referring to this data to claim that “all is well” in NREGA payments. However, workers across the country wait for a long time for their payments, beyond the stipulated timeline of 15 days.
The Supreme Court in 2018 had directed the union government to show the full extent of delay in payments on the website and pay compensations to the workers accordingly. However, the current reports on the website do not reflect the total number of transactions delayed beyond 15 days.
Instead, the ministry has come up with a report called Stage-2 tracking which shows the volume of pending payments from the central government at any given point but does not reflect the delays beyond the stipulated timelines. Once the Centre starts releasing ( even if they do it after considerable delays, violating the Act), the report will show reduced pending transactions and amounts.
An independent social advocacy group called Libtech recently studied the payments in Andhra Pradesh. Its published report reveals that the Centre takes 26 days on an average to process payments from their end (Stage-2). Adding the average time taken for stage-1 processes, the report reveals that the total time taken to credit the wages into worker’s account is 29 days on an average.
The group has studied all payments for all job cards for FY 2019-20, 2020-21 and up to July 31, FY 2021-22 in 130 Gram Panchayats of Andhra Pradesh (which is 1% of total number of Gram Panchayats in the State).
Adding more complexities to the issue, the government very recently introduced a caste-based payments processing system
This report clearly indicates that the extent of delay is significant. However, the government has been in denial. It is also not clear why the ministry does not put the data for extent of delays clearly in the public domain and instead use technical nomenclatures and processes which only mislead citizens.
In 2018, the Central government had stated in the Supreme Court that only 17% in 2016-17 and 43% of the payments in 2017-18 were paid on time (i.e. within 15 days), which means they keep a track on the exact delays but purposely do not place the report in the public domain.
Adding more complexities to the issue, the government very recently introduced a caste-based payments processing system wherein the fund transfer orders will be segregated into three different caste categories, i.e. SC, ST and Others, and will be processed separately.
This arrangement is unnecessary and likely to further delay the processes. While the government should simply focus on making on-time payments to all those who have worked under the programme, the Centre seem to be experimenting needlessly with workers' hard earned money.
The Centre time and again has claimed that all payments glitches have been resolved through Aadhaar-based payments systems. However, contrary to the claim of the Union government, the introduction of Aadhar into the NREGA payments system has proved to be detrimental and has created several challenges in ensuring on time payments to the workers.
The issues of misdirected payments (money being credited to someone else’s account instead of the worker), rejection of payments due to Aadhaar de-linking by the banks are some of the puzzling issues which are new add-ons to the various other causes of NREGA payments delays.
Also, the issues of NREGA payments are not limited to the matter of Aadhaar linkages and it has deep connections with the quality of local implementation. The government might want to claim success to promote the use of Aadhaar in social welfare programmesm but facts do not corroborate the Central claims.
Almost 70% of the centrally allocated funds have been exhausted this year (as on August 31, 2021) and payments have been delayed almost by a month, at-least twice within the first five months. In such circumstances, the ground implementation will be significantly slowed down in the absence of adequate allocation and on-time release of payments.
The Centre should ensure decentralized mechanisms for payments where local Panchayati Raj representatives will have more power in the payments processes as well as in dealing with grievances regarding payments. NREGA, when conceived in 2005, was considered to be a programme which can deepen the local democratic processes and promote decentralization.
However, the current over-centralization has not helped to smooth up local governance of the programme. The official website shows that 43% (worth Rs 2846 crore) of the August payments were pending as on September 7, 2021.
---
*With NREGA Sangharsh Morcha

Comments

Anonymous said…
digital india - non digital rural india. what a combination. add to that no funds and one has a superb mess. When did caste go digital ?

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.

In defence of Sam Pitroda: Is calling someone look like African, black racist?

By Rajiv Shah  Sam Pitroda, known as the father of Indian telecom revolution, has been in the midst of a major controversy for a remark on how Indians across the regions look different. While one can understand Prime Minister Narendra Modi taking it up for his electoral gain, suggesting it showed the racist Congress mindset, what was unpalatable to me was Congress leaders – particularly Jairam Ramesh, known for his deep intellectual understand – distancing themselves from what Pitroda had said.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.