Assam violence: Dubbed extremist, civil rights group protests in Delhi, seeks judicial probe

By A Representative
Even as the Assam government has named the Popular Front of India (PFI) for being “involved” in the recent violence during an eviction drive in the State’s Darrang district, with Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma terming the group “extremist”, PFI has staged a protest at Jantar Mantar in Delhi against “police atrocities in Assam on helpless protesting people during the inhuman eviction drive.”
In a statement following the protest, PFI said, “It can be seen in the footages coming out of Assam in recent days: Police is seen opening fire without any warning at thousands of people including women and children. A man who get caught up between police personnel was brutally lynched while even media person is seen joining the brutality. Reports suggest that the actual number of casualties might be far higher. One of the three killed appears to be a minor.”
Added PFI, “In the past few days Assam authorities evicted around 4,500 poor helpless people from their houses without presenting any rehabilitation plan by accusing them of illegal encroachment. It is while the case filed against the government move is still in the court that around 800 families were thrown out to street in heavy rain and their houses were destroyed.”
According to PFI, “This eviction drive is quite inhuman”, demanding “intervention of judiciary to bring the eviction to immediate halt” and ensuring “rehabilitation of the people who have already been expelled from their homes.” It added, “Steps must be taken to adequately compensate the victims of the police firing.”
Meanwhile, in a separate statement, another group, the Campus Front of India, rejecting the Assam Chief Minister's allegations, said, it is “a heinous move to cover-up the terror face of the BJP government that happened during the unethical eviction.”

It added, “The police killed two innocent people in the guise of eviction is clearly an indiscretion. When the issue is being widely criticised and people begin to agitate, the government is seeking ways to renounce their responsibility in the cold blooded crime.”

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo* A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

Counterview

Search This Blog