Skip to main content

Ayodhya, Kumbh: 85% people wanted sacred places closed, 50% 'favoured' lockdown

By Rajiv Shah 

A new Covid survey report, published by well-known human rights organisation Anhad, has said that 84.7 per cent of 2,243 respondents said it was necessary for all religious places to be closed down during the second wave of Covid-19. In sharp contrast, only 49.5 per cent supported the lockdown, with 37.5 per cent saying they were “unhappy” with it, insisting, it created problems instead of presenting a solution, 36.7 percent reported loss of earning and 32.5 percent said their freedom to move was curtailed.
Carried out among educated sections of several Indian States, the report appears to suggest, holding massive events like Kumbh at Haridwar led to the spread of the virus across the country, the report titled “The Covid Survey report The Second Pulse of the Pandemic: A Sudden Surge in the Scientific Temper during the Covid-19 Crises.”
It says, “We asked in view of second wave should all religious places be closed, if yes for how long. About 32.2 per cent of the respondents thought that the religious places should have been closed for three months, , 18.0 per cent thought that the closure should be for six months and 16 per cent believed that it should be for one year.”
Apparently blaming the way the Government of India handled the pandemic, the report says, 50.2 per cent of the respondents directly held the government responsible for the second wave”, though about 21.9 per cent thought that “people themselves were responsible.” Another 18.9 per cent believed that since the SARS-CoV-2 mutated, “the new strand was responsible for virility as well as mortality during the second wave.”
The report – authored by Gauhar Raza, former professor at the The Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research and chief scientist at the National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources; and Surjit Singh, asociate professor, Indira Gandhi University, Meerpur, Rewari, who has served at the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for 35 years – adds, “Almost one in ten respondents thought that the religious places must be closed for ever. An equal number (9.5%) emphatically argued for ‘no closure'. 11.9 per cent were non-committal.”
The report further says, “In answer to the question, India has large number of religious places, do you think we need more hospitals compared to religious places, quite clearly and overwhelmingly Indian citizens were found to be in favour of hospitals instead of religious places. In response to this question about 90 per cent of the respondents have voted for constructing more hospital compared to religious places. Construction of religious places garnered only 2.2 per cent votes.”
The report comments, “Ironically, the government has refused to stop expenditure on religious places and use the funds to strengthen the health infrastructure. Even during the period of profound grief and deaths when in other countries, rich and poor alike woke up to stop expenditure on non-essential projects in India the construction of new parliamentary vista was not put to a halt, instead the government passed special guidelines to continue the work.”
It continues, “Way back in October 2020, many groups of scientists had warned that the pandemic may intensify in future and the predictive models had suggested curative measures. Instead of paying heed to what was being advised, as the number of cases reduced, political leadership and policy makers hurried to take credit. Patting the backs, they claimed that their policies and decisions saved lives. They allowed and organized Kumbh Mela, religious gathering, open religious places and held political rallies where hundreds of thousands congregated without observing Covid protocol.”
Also taking strong exception to Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurating construction of a “massive temple at a disputed site in Ayodhya”, the report says, as for the Kumbh Mela, organised at Haridwar, “The State government of Uttaranchal advertised the event and welcomed people from all over the country and millions participated.”
When asked from where the pandemic had come, respondents overwhelmingly (74 per cent) “understood” that it was “brought into the country by those who had come from abroad”, the report says, though adding, just about 4.9 per cent “thought that it has been brought and spread into the country by Tablighi Jamat, which is a religious organization of Sunni Muslims.” Interestingly, “About 4.4 per cent blamed the rich and 0.3 per cent thought the poor must be blamed for spreading the scourge.”
The authors believe, “The virus known as the Delta variant had emerged in parts of Maharashtra, and due to laxity”, and it got “a chance to spread rapidly through the country and the world”, adding, “There was mayhem in India with its weak health system, especially in the vast hinterland. Infections and deaths grew exponentially in March 2021. Super spreader events (elections and Kumbh) helped spread it. Allowing these events was a political decision by the Centre – a big mistake.”
Those who helped carry out the survey on the basis of data collected through online and offline questionnaire included Leena Dabiru, legal and development consultant, and Shabnam Hashmi, social activist and founder, Anhad. Of those who surveyed were from Delhi (17.3%), followed by Maharashtra (11.9%), Haryana (11.3%) and Gujarat (11.0%), Uttar Pradesh (7.3%), Jammu and Kashmir (6.9%) and Madhya Pradesh (5.2%).
“The intensity of Covid-19 pandemic did not permit us to conduct face-to-face interviews and therefore we could not approach those who do not have reading and writing skills”, the report says. “As a result the level of education of the sampled population was quite high with 35.9 per cent graduates and 36.3 percent post-graduates.”

Comments

Neither the UPA government nor the NDA--past and present--has spent on health infrastructure. The problem is that this time it was essential to give it priority, which the government failed to do.

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.