Skip to main content

Universal vaccination? At proposed price, single dose will be 'higher' than poverty line

By Bappaditya Mukhopadhyay* 

If we must keep the serious repercussions of the third wave away we absolutely need to treat Covid vaccination as Fun Free, Universal and Now! It is just not ethical, but good economics. It is puzzling as to why the government is contemplating a complicated multi-party negotiation, differential pricing, market intervention in something where market economics will only cause more damage.
To understand this, we must begin with understanding network economics. In network economics, to an individual, the benefit of doing something not only depends upon what he does but also upon how many others are doing the same.
Expecting competition, market forces and prices to take care of demand supply gaps will have little effect in network economics. Vaccinations are perfect examples of network effect-more the individuals around me are vaccinated more effective is my vaccine! So, the decision to get vaccine must be universal because the benefits are universal.
There are two advantages of vaccines. One, it lowers the chances of contracting the virus and two, in the event that one contracts the virus, the effects are milder. Our best bet in keeping the third wave away is to first keep Covid-19 away as much as possible followed by lowering hospitalization instances should one get infected.
Keeping Covid-19 away through social distancing is a tougher task given our stressed economy, major metros with large population densities and many shared resources. Further, as vaccination lowers the chances of hospitalization, it would lower the pressure on the existing health infrastructure; and that directly benefits everyone. Once we accept the logic of universal vaccination, we must now address the possible bottlenecks that could prevent it.
The first and perhaps the most serious bottleneck is the supply itself. As of today, we have administered close to 17 crore vaccines. However, with less than 2.8% of the population receiving the complete dose and less than 10% receiving a single dose, at the current rate of vaccinating 3 million a day, we are well behind the curve.
It is true that initially there was reluctance among many to get vaccinated. Though, to blame the current level of low vaccination rate on the citizens’ reluctance, is misinterpreting the data and running away from solving the problem.
There are around 25 crore Indians (based on 2011 Census) who are above the age group of 45. Given that as of now only 17 crore vaccines have been administered, if everyone eligible in the 45 years+ age group had decided to get vaccinated, then less than 50% of them, would have received vaccination.
There has always been a demand-supply gap and we need to urgently procure vaccines at a rate that is least 10 times more compared to the current rate. We cannot only rely on domestic production. A large chunk must be imported, across Nations and across vaccine manufacturers.
To do this without diplomatic channels and leaving it at the “market forces” is disastrous. For this, it is must that the procurement is the responsibility of the Centre and not allow multiple players to compete, bid and clog the pipeline.
It doesn’t need rocket science to predict that profit-making manufacturers would be more inclined to serve the ones who can pay more
However, there are crucial areas of public private partnership but not in the process of procurement but in manufacturing and administering the vaccines. Nowhere else, certainly not in the process of price setting for the end user should be open to market outcomes. Covid vaccination must be free for all.
The argument of network economics states that end user paying nothing is not subsidy. It is the switching cost. The opportunity cost arising from some of the population not being vaccinated is much higher than the cost any government must be prepared to incur.
Just the GST shortfall for a month of lockdown will be many times over our budget for universal and free vaccination. With the current proposed pricing, at some places the cost for a single dose will be higher than the poverty line itself! Expecting economically stressed households to pay that is beyond any rational belief.
As a result, two things will happen, the rich, who can afford will get vaccinated first, and the poor will be left far behind. One could argue that the vaccine would be free in government hospitals. It doesn’t need rocket science to predict that profit-making manufacturers would be more inclined to serve the ones who can pay more (in this case the private hospitals) than others. Thus, many will be left behind.
The whole exercise will be a waste as the vaccines are only effective when more people are vaccinated! Should the rich pay more? Sure. The government can collect a “vaccine cess” from some of the taxpayers to meet any shortfall, but it must never allow differential pricing so that some get priority over others.
It must be, therefore, be the duty and right of every citizen, for their own good, to demand free vaccine for all- for themselves, their neighbors or anyone they will come in contact with.
---
*Professor at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Gurgaon. His research interests are in the area of Data Analytics and Public Policy

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”