Skip to main content

48% Indians in US support Modi, but 22% to vote 'American Modi' Trump: Survey

By Rajiv Shah

A US think-tank study has said that even though Prime Minister Narendra Modi still enjoys considerable support among Indian diaspora in the country – 48% of Indian Americans approve of Modi’s performance, 32 percent disapprove, while 20% have “no opinion” – the man often dubbed as American Modi, Donald Trump, is unlikely to get more than 22% of their votes in the November 3 US polls, with his rival, Joseph Biden, likely to get 72% of the votes.
Carried out by Sumitra Badrinathan, an advanced PhD student in political science at the University of Pennsylvania; Devesh Kapur, Professor of South Asian Studies and director of Asia Programs at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies; and Milan Vaishnav, Director, South Asian Programme, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the study says, ironically, “Those who disapprove of Trump are roughly equally split on Modi: 41 percent of those who disapprove of Trump approve of Modi, while 38 percent disapprove of him.”
Insisting that “recent anecdotal narratives notwithstanding, there is scant evidence that Democratic voters are defecting toward Trump and the Republican Party”, the study says, “Indian Americans do not consider US-India relations to be one of the principal determinants of their vote choice in this election”, adding, “Economy and healthcare are the two most important issues influencing” their “vote choice.”
According to the study, “Even though Indian Americans comprise slightly more than 1% of the total US population – and less than 1% of all registered voters – both major parties are leaving no stone unturned in reaching out to this community.” Thus, if “Biden’s campaign issued a manifesto specifically aimed at Indian American voters”, as Trump’s campaigners “recently shared an online advertisement wooing Indians in America with images of Trump and Modi sharing the stage at a massive rally in Houston in September 2019.”
The study believes, the Democratic choice of Kamala Harris as vice presidential candidacy has especially “galvanized a large section of the Indian American community”, pointing out, 45% of respondents indicated that Harris’s selection made them more likely to vote for Democrats, while just 10 percent indicated that it made them less likely to vote. About 40%, however, said it made “no difference either way.”
The study states, “A large section of Indian Americans view the Republican Party as unwelcoming. Indian Americans refrain from identifying with the Republican Party due, in part, to a perception that the party is intolerant of minorities and overly influenced by Christian evangelicalism. Those who identify as Republicans are primarily moved to do so because of economic policy differences with the Democrats – with particularly marked differences regarding healthcare.”

Further, 71% of respondents “either strongly or somewhat oppose” White House measures to retaliate against critical journalists. Two-thirds (67%) “oppose” efforts by law enforcement to use force against peaceful #BlackLifeMatters protesters. About 60% oppose Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban”, while 57% disapprove of “stringent action” to deport illegal immigrants.
The study is based on what it calls “a nationally representative online survey of 936 Indian American citizens conducted between September 1 and September 20, 2020, in partnership with YouGov”, claiming, it has “an overall margin of error of +/- 3.2%.” In 2018, the size of the Indian American population stood at 4.16 million, out of which 2.62 million were US citizens. The total eligible voter population is 1.9 million, or about 0.82 percent of all eligible voters in the country.
The study says, “When asked how they self-identify, 56 percent of Indian Americans report that they consider themselves Democrats, 15 percent consider themselves to be Republicans, while another 22 percent identify as independents”, adding, among those who consider themselves Democrats, 76% “identify as strong Democrats, 19% identify as not very strong Democrats, and another 10% lean toward the Democratic Party.”
On the other side, as for the Republican supporters, the study says, “Just 7% of respondents identify as strong Republicans while another 8% are not very strong Republicans and only 3% lean Republican”, adding, “All told, two-thirds of respondents (66%) tend toward the Democratic Party while 18% tend toward the Republican Party.” Around 13% of respondents “are independents who do not lean toward either party, while 4% percent are not sure of where they stand.”
As for American Indians’ ideological frame of mind, the study says, “While 29% of Indian American citizens classify themselves as moderate, a larger share of the remaining respondents place themselves on the ideological left: 11% identify as extremely liberal, 23% identify as liberal, and 13% identify as slightly liberal.” On the other hand, “The proportion of respondents situated on the right end of the ideological spectrum is much smaller: 4% identify as extremely conservative, 13% identify as conservative, and an additional 6% identify as slightly conservative.”
Interestingly, the younger generation American Indians prefer Biden over Trump. The study says, “75% of voters between the ages of 18 and 29 intend to vote for Biden; this proportion declines to 64% for ages 30 to 49, before rising again to 69% for those above the age of 50.”
Then,, says the study, while Indians of all religious faiths prefer Biden to Trump, there is an important caveats. “Muslim support for Biden (82%) is considerably higher than Hindu support (67%), which in turn is considerably higher than Christian support (49%). The latter community is also the most supportive of Trump (45 percent). Then “69% of women and 68% of men intend to vote for Biden, while just 19% of women and 24% of men plan to vote for Trump.”
---
This story has also been published in National Herald

Comments

A year ago I might have been surprised at this but not now. The way Trump has been talking about "foreigners", which includes Indian residents/citizens, they must have realised that he is not a reliable friend of India or of anyone except Donald Trump.

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Palm oil industry deceptively using geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.