Skip to main content

Centre's attitude 'ludicrous' as growing list of MPs demand new HC bench for west UP

By Sanjeev Sirohi*
It is heartening that one after other leaders both from BJP and Opposition parties like BSP are raising the demand for the creation of a high court bench in West UP. The latest to join the growing list of MPs demanding the creation of a high court bench in West UP is Kunwar Danish Ali of BSP from Amroha. He has demanded that it should be created at the earliest.
Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad did acknowledge that Danish Ali’s demand for a bench in West UP was valid and he assured that he would try on this. Danish Ali told the Centre that when it can finish any law in no time then why can’t it create a high court bench in West UP promptly? He also drew the attention of Parliament that the demand for a high court bench in West UP is very old and people have to travel so far due to which they have to waste both their time and money!
However, the reason cited by Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad for the delay in creating bench in West UP was ludicrous. The Centre must stop putting the onus on creating benches on Judges of the Allahabad High Court, especially its full bench. If West UP can’t be given bench, then the Centre must disband all high court benches in India.
The Union Law Minister overlooked what ex-CJI Ranjan Gogoi, while disposing of a petition on this filed by a lady advocate KL Chitra last year, had said, while appreciating the dire need for a bench in West UP, that it is for the Centre to decide on it.
How can the Union Law Minister ignore that even the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended the creation of a high court bench in West UP? When a bench can be created at Lucknow on July 1, 1948 why can’t a new bench be created even 72 years later?
Meanwhile, UP Bar Council chairman Harishankar Singh has warned that if the Centre and the UP state government do not pay attention to the demand for a high court bench for West UP, there will be a big agitation for it.
Calling upon advocates of West UP to give a memorandum for high court bench, Harishankar Singh said, the one state and one high court concept, said that in Lucknow there is a separate high court bench and there are many states where there are 2 to 3 high court benches. In fact, Assam and Maharashtra have 4 benches. He added, UP is the oldest state, and according to its area and population the demand for a high court bench is legitimate which will be fulfilled at all cost.
The Justice Jaswant Singh commission recommended three high court benches for UP but not one was created, even though on its recommendations benches of high court were created at Aurangabad in Maharashtra, Madurai in Tamil Nadu, and Jalpaiguri in West Bengal. It is baffling as to why no government the Centre has ever fulfilled the legitimate and compelling need for a high court bench in West UP for the more than nine crore people living here in 26 districts.
Why is the BJP government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who enjoys majority in both houses of Parliament, is not listening to even its own Union Ministers and MPs from West UP who repeatedly keep raising the demand for a high court bench in Parliament itself? Why is it ignoring former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who had raised the demand for a high court bench in West UP right in Parliament while he was leader of Opposition?
Ravi Shankar Prasad
Uttar Pradesh is the biggest state, in India with maximum population at more than 23 crore, which is more than even that of Pakistan and many other countries, and there are only – three countries including China, India, USA – which have more population than UP, maximum MPs in Lok Sabha at 80, maximum MPs in Rajya Sabha at 31, maximum MLAs in Vidhan Sabha at 404, maximum MLAs in Vidhan Parishad at 100.
It has maximum judges at lower courts at more than 5000, maximum Judges in High Courts at 160, maximum pending cases in lower courts at more than 50 lakhs, maximum pending cases in high court at more than 10 lakh, maximum members in UP Bar Council, 3.5 lakh, the highest not just in India but in the whole world.
Allahabad High Court is the biggest high court not just in India but in whole of Asia, yet has just one bench which is so close at Lucknow – just 200 km away. It is also one of the oldest high courts, completing its 150 year of creation in 2016.
Who can deny that lawyers in West UP, even Supreme Court lawyers, are not safe in West UP, as seen in the recent brutal murder of lady advocate Kuljeet Kaur in Noida in West UP right inside her house? Similarly, former Chairperson of the UP Bar Council Darvesh Yadav within three days of being elected was brutally murdered right inside court premises in Agra in West UP by pumping three bullets on her.
More recently we saw a senior lawyer in Meerut, Mukesh Sharma, being brutally murdered just adjacent to his house. Another advocate Zahid was murdered in Baghpat. In Muzaffarnagar still another advocate Ameer Saifi was murdered. For how long will West UP's legitimate claim for a high court bench be consistently ignored?
UP must have maximum benches in India and not minimum. The Centre's adamant approach to not creating any bench anywhere else in UP other than Lucknow is responsible for the demands being raised for separate state as we see in Bundelkhand, West UP, Poorvanchal and other parts also.
The Centre can create two more benches for a peaceful state like Karnataka at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts, even though it had a bench already at Hubli, just 6 crore people living in the state, but for more than 9 crore people of West UP it is not ready to create even a single bench. Karnataka has just about 1 lakh pending cases, as against UP, which has more than 10 lakh pending cases, of which West UP alone has more than 5 lakh pending cases.
The 230th report of Law Commission of India in 2009 recommended creation of more high court benches as it would help people get speedy justice! Naresh Dutt Sharma, who is general secretary of Meerut Bar, has very rightly said, “The state government has several times sent resolutions for creating bench in West UP. The Central Action Committee of West UP has also spoken several times to State Government and done gherao also. Centre has the power to create a bench in West UP and ensure that cheap justice is given to people here.”
He added, “The Law Minister is misguiding Parliament. The Centre can directly create bench in UP. There is no need for any resolution. The Centre’s intentions are not noble on this. BJP leaders from West UP are also not determined due to which Bench has not been created here.”
---
*Senior advocate, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Dowry over duty: How material greed shattered a seven-year bond

By Archana Kumar*  This account does not seek to expose names or tarnish identities. Its purpose is not to cast blame, but to articulate—with dignity—the silent suffering of a woman who lived her life anchored in love, trust, and duty, only to be ultimately abandoned.