Why is UP govt so afraid of activists holding meetings?, asks Sandeep Pandey

By A Representative
In a statement in Lucknow one day after the Uttar Pradesh government barring eight activists from addressing scribes in Ayodhya, senior Magsaysay award winning social activist Sandeep Pandey and advocate Mohammad Shoaib have wondered, "Why is the government so afraid of us holding meetings?"
Claiming that there were five attacks on freedom of expression in 10 days, they by said, "On August 11 and 16, 2019, advocate Mohammad Shoaib, Sandeep Pandey, Rajeev Yadav and others were house arrested in their homes to prevent them for participating in candlelight demonstration in support of people of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K)."
Then, on August 17, 2019, Prof Ram Puniyani, Sandeep Pandey, Rajeev Yadav, Hafeez Kidwai "were stopped from proceeding towards Ayodhya to participate in a communal harmony meeting and sent back from Raunahi." This was followed on August 19, 2019, when Acharya Yugal Kishor Shashtri, Faisal Khan and Sandeep Pandey were "prevented from addressing a press conference at Ram Janaki temple in Ayodhya."
They were "detained and dropped at Ram Snehi Ghat in police jeep so that people who had come from outside would return to Lucknow and they would not be able to talk to press persons from Ayodhya."
And on Tuesday, August 20, 2019, "when Sandeep Pandey, Faisal Khan, Gopal Krishna Verma, Alok Singh, Usha Vishwakarma, Sharad Patel, Ravindra, etc. were holding an internal meeting at Gandhi Bhawan, Lucknow, a person from intelligence department asked whether they had permission for the meeting."
The statement asked, "If limited number of people sit inside a room to discuss something why should it be a matter of concern for the government?" It underlined, "The behaviour of government is as if it has done something wrong. If it was not so the government would not have so blatantly and frequently violated our fundamental rights to freedom of expression, freedom of forming organisation and freedom of holding meeting."

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor* Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

By Harsh Thakor* The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities.

The Dalit body on screen: Stereotypes, sacrifice, and subjugation in Hindi films

By Dr. Prem Singh* Despite centuries of reformist efforts, from Gandhi and Ambedkar to contemporary activists, the caste system remains deeply embedded in the Indian psyche. One of the primary reasons for this persistence is the religious sanction provided by Brahminical scriptures, which have shaped not only social structures but also cultural and artistic expressions.

Counterview

Search This Blog