Skip to main content

Right to layoff workers in Gujarat a major Modi "achievement" of the two years of NDA rule: Panagariya

By A Representative
Top Narendra Modi aide Arvind Panagariya believes, one of the major achievement of his boss is his ability to push through the exit policy in India. Thus, he says, in Gujarat, firms of all sizes located in the special economic zones (SEZs), special investment regions (SIRs) and national investment and manufacturing zones (NIMZs) have “the right to lay off workers” at will.
Economist at the Columbia University hired by the Prime Minister to run Planning Commission successor Niti Aayog,Panagariya's statement comes amidst failure of SEZs to pick up in Gujarat and strong opposition to SIRs being planned at a dozen odd spots, with the Gujarat government thinking of abandoning many of them, including the one in Dholera, south of Ahmedabad.
Panagariya, who has written an article to mark Modi's current visit to the US, circulating it through his Twitter account, says, other major achievements of the NDA government include 100 percent FDI in defence through the approval route, 100 percent FDI in in marketing of food products produced in India and 49 percent FDI in insurance.
Refusing to recall "achievements" in health, education and environment, Panagariya blames it on “space considerations” which “do not allow” to report on the “progress” in social sectors.” The “achievement” he recounts is “enhanced efficiency through rapid expansion of biometric identity based direct benefit transfers that eliminate multiple accounts in the name of the same beneficiary and ghost accounts.”
Without giving any figures, Panagariya says, the government has “also chosen empowerment over entitlement and thus focused on accelerating building of rural roads, electrification of villages and broadband connectivity. With the groundwork, thus, in place, we can count on growth and the progress in reducing poverty accelerating yet further in the years to come.”
Calling his view “strictly personal”, Panagariya claims that the GDP of India reached 7.6 percent in 2015-16, even as refusing to go into the latest the controversy surrounding it, with top consulting firm Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) calculating it at 5.2 percent, down from 7.2 percent a year ago, and blaming the latest 7.6 percent figure based on inflated “discrepancies”.
Praising the Modi government for neutralizing certain “counter-productive measures” of the UPA such as the Land Acquisition Act of 2013, Panagariya says, the government now seeking to unveil “a model land-leasing law to help modernize tenancy laws across states.”
Asserting that the “turnaround” under Modi has come on the “back of concerted efforts at accelerating infrastructure building” , Panagariya cites such examples like roads construction “climbing up from 11.7 kilometer (7.2 miles) per day in 2013-14 to to 16.5 km (10.2 miles) in 2015-16”, and “domestic civil aviation” improving, with “total number of passengers carried” having jumped “from 66.4 million in 2014 to 80.8 million in 2015.”
Panagariya further believes, “There has been a total absence of any allegations of corruption during the two-year tenure of the government.” He adds, “Often overlooked, this is a major achievement in a country that has seen corruption scandals break out under virtually every government in recent decades.”
In yet another claim, Panagariya says, “The wealth of crony capitalists in India has fallen to 3 percent of the GDP in 2016 from 18 percent of the GDP in 2008.”

Comments

TRENDING

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia." 

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

School job scam and the future of university degree holders in West Bengal

By Harasankar Adhikari  The school recruitment controversy in West Bengal has emerged as one of the most serious governance challenges in recent years, raising concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the broader impact on society. Allegations that school jobs were obtained through irregular means have led to prolonged legal scrutiny, involving both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In one instance, a panel for high school teacher recruitment was ultimately cancelled after several years of service, following extended judicial proceedings and debate.