Skip to main content

Indian mission told to follow Aussie laws: Sydney consulate fined $10,620 for "unfair" dismissal of employee

Sydney Consul general
By A Representative
In what is being interpreted by the Indian diaspora across Australia as “not a very bright event” for the community, the Indian consulate in Sydney has been fined $10,620 over “unfair dismissal” of an employee, who claims to be a whistleblower, Hitendra Kumar, an immigrant working with it as a driver.
A report published in the “South Asia Times (SAT)” (June 2016), a periodical published from Melbourne, Australia, has said that after Kumar’s employment was terminated, he challenged “the unfair dismissal” in the Fair Work Commission court.
Talking about what went wrong, Kumar has been quoted as saying, “When I began to highlight serious issues and discrepancies in what was going on at the consulate, I was sacked on a trumped up charge. I’m delighted that I’ve been vindicated by the Courts.”
The judgement went in favour of the employee after the consulate put up stiff resistance despite the court providing the option for an out-of-course settlement, which could have “saved a lot of money and embarrassment and litigation for the consulate.”
Based on documents obtained by Ashok Kumar of the “Indian Subcontinent Times, Sidney, the report said, the consulate “opted to go ahead with the court with proceedings and thereby incurring three times the cost and ended up paying 12 weeks’ salary $10,620.”
Ashok Kumar
“The consulate ignored the fact that working laws are different in Australia than in India and it had to follow Australian procedures when dealing with any Australian citizen or permanent resident as the employee of the consulate”, the report said.
The report quoted Transport Workers’ Union acting secretary Richard Olsen welcoming the decision by the Fair Work Commission to award a driver “unfairly” dismissed by the Indian consulate, saying that it would send “a clear message that no employer is above the law.”
Olsen said, “This decision sends a message to all workers in Australia, especially foreign migrants, that you have rights no matter who your boss is or what they tell you. It also sends a message to employers that even if you have diplomatic immunity, you still have to play by Australian workplace laws.”
He further said, “There are systematic problems with the exploitation of foreign workers in Australia”, adding, “From 7-Eleven, the transport industry and all the way up to foreign embassies, we have seen foreign migrants underpaid, exploited and sacked by their bosses if they speak up.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
Discuss the actual case's details mate rather than beating around the bush or at least give the link to the case order itself.

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.