Skip to main content

Gujarat's Junagadh farmers protest against inclusion into urban area, say 40% of land would be taken away

Sagar Rabari (centre) leading the rally
By A Representative
In a show of strength, nearly 5,000 farmers of 42 villages around Junagadh, a major city in Saurashtra region of Gujarat, have protested in front of the district collector’s office, Junagadh, demanding that their villages should excluded from the new Junagadh Urban Development Authority (JUDA), as planned. After taking out a rally in the city, they submitted a memorandum giving reasons for not their villages to be outside JUDA.
District collector Alok Kumar Pandey took the memorandum from a group of representatives of the protesting farmers, who he met him, but refused to either cool down the farmers’ tempers on how JUDA, in government view, would “benefit” the farmers, or whether there is going to be any possibility of amending the JUDA decision.
“The district collector merely took the order and said he would forward it to the authorities in Gandhinagar”, said farmers’ leader Sagar Rabari from the Khedut Samaj – Gujarat. The district collector is chairman of JUDA, too.
This is the second protest meeting in Junagadh within a week against the Gujarat government move to include the 42 villages in JUDA. The first meeting took place on October 6, when about 2,000 farmers gathered to understand what JUDA meant to them. They were told about how they stand to lose in case their villages become part of JUDA.
Farmers march towards JUDA office
The farmers were told that, by allowing their villages to be included JUDA, they stand to lose 40 per cent of their agricultural land, as all the 42 villages would directly fall under the Town Planning Act. The Act requires farmers to hand over 40 per cent of the land in the name of developing city infrastructure, and hands over rest of the 60 per cent land at a different spot.
Taken out under the banner “Resist and Reject Urbanisation”, a ground report on the rally from Junagadh said, the people of 42 villages belonged to Junagadh and Vanthali blocks of Junagadh district, and were agitated against their inclusion into JUDA.
The rally was held under the banner of the Khedut Hit Rakshak Samiti, said the report, adding, its main focus was on how inclusion in JUDA would mean “a death knell for them and their families”. The ground report quoted the farmer leaders as saying, “This should be a wake-up call to all those who propagate ‘urbanisation as development’ formula for the ills plaguing India.”
“The farmers gathered near the statue of Jhansi-ni-Rani, and marched to the JUDA office, shouting slogans against JUDA and their displeasure at their inclusion in it”, said the ground report, adding, “If the government does not reverse its decision in this regard within 15 days then the people will decide the future course of action.”
The Khedut Hit Rakshak Samiti was led by Atul Shekhda, while Sagar Rabari represented Khedut Samaj – Gujarat and Jamin Adhikar Andolan Gujarat (JAAG).
Similar protests have broken out among villagers of Surat district, who have refused their inclusion into the Surat Urban Development Authority (SUDA), and Sabarkantha district, whose villages do not inclusion into the North Gujarat town of Himatnagar.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Dowry over duty: How material greed shattered a seven-year bond

By Archana Kumar*  This account does not seek to expose names or tarnish identities. Its purpose is not to cast blame, but to articulate—with dignity—the silent suffering of a woman who lived her life anchored in love, trust, and duty, only to be ultimately abandoned.