Skip to main content

Following protests off Narmada, govt disbands tourism authority, but will acquire land as "public purpose"

By A Representative
The Gujarat government has given clear indications that, despite the tribal farmers’ protests, it will go ahead with the proposed tourism project around the so-called Statue of Unity it is planning just about three kilometers downstream of the Narmada dam. In a statement issued ahead of the stone-laying ceremony for the statue, to be in the memory of Sardar Patel on October 31, the birth anniversary of the Iron Man, and envisaged as “three times higher than the Statue of Liberty” in New York, the state government declared the area around the statue will be developed into a “world-class tourism spot”, but refused to say how much land it would acquire under "public purpose" provision of the new land acquisition Act.
The tribal farmers have already declared they will not take the package lying down. According to a statement issued by Sitter Gam Adivasi Sangathan, there is "no clarity" on whether the tourism project would be given up and the forcible acquisition of their land, as planned, would not take place in future. "Villagers will stage a protest in their village on October 31 by continuously beating steel plates and waving awareness flags to show protest that they will not be satisfied till all their demands are met", the statement said, adding, "Nor is there any clarity on what will happen to the villages, whether they will be submerged, in case the Garudeshwar weir is constructed across the Narmada 12 kilometres from the dam."
Tribal farmers of around 70 villages around the Narmada dam recently raised their pitch of protest against the threat issued to them by the Kevadia Area Development Authority (KADA), a state government body formed about a year ago, and given responsibility for developing tourism in the region, that they either decide to agree to hand over their land for tourism or face consequences. Kevadia colony is the spot where the Narmada dam is situated. The protests forced the state government to call them for negotiations on October 15, where they were told to “hold on” till October 31, when the Gujarat chief minister plans to lay stone for the Sardar Statue.
Even while announcing that it has decided to “disband” KADA, which had issued the threat, the statement gives no assurance on putting off the tribals’ main – to disband the tourism project on their land. As many as 145 representatives from 70 villages had met Cabinet members of the Modi government – finance minister Nitin Patel, revenue minister Anandiben Patel and tribal and forest minister Ganpat Vasava – in order to put up the demand. The talks, which took place in the presence of Narmada district collector Rakesh Shankar, ended after the ministers succeeded in getting promise from the representatives that they would not disturb Modi’s programme on October 31.
While there is no assurance to tribal farmers that their land would not be acquired for tourism purpose, the statement states that the Gujarat government has decided to “assuage the three-decades-old demand of the tribal farmers of six villages in the immediate neighbourhood of Kevadia by providing them with a package similar to the Narmada oustees.” Other “demands” which the statement government said it has decided to meet include formation of a new taluka called Garudeshwar to include 94 villages surrounding the Narmada dam, and provide irrigation waters to the tribal farmers of these villages.
The statement suggested that the area around the proposed statue will be developed to “showcase” Gujarat’s “development efforts” in the recent past via tourism. Apart from an audio-visual show on Sardar Patel’s life, including a daily light-and-sound show, the “world-class tourism” spot would include a “virtual tour, which would showcase Gujarat’s agricultural development, water resource management, amelioration of the tribals, and other developmental activities.” There will also be a museum in the memory of Sardar Patel, people will be taken up on the statue’s top, apart from a ferry service to and from the spot where the Sardar statue is proposed, Sadhu bet.
Meanwhile, the state government declared the collection of iron from India’s farmers to build the statue on a public-private partnership mode will begin on October 31, even as top government officials once again doubting if such iron could at all be used for such a big 182-metre high statue. A knowledgeable official source said, “We have no knowledge of the quality of iron to be given to us by the people. It clearly cannot be used for building the statue. It is at best a symbolic gesture. The iron, at best, can be used for railings and such other things. Besides, we have still not gone into the cost of bringing the iron and taking it for melting for the construction of the statue.”

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”