Skip to main content

Modi's pay back time to UPA’s "wrongs"? Deft hands at work for measured steps to sidestep anti-defection law

Modi in Arunachal Pradesh
By RK Misra*
Past is never past. It returns to haunt the future. See how. And I quote:
“It is a matter of great concern that the federal structure is under increasing strain, merely to suit the whims and fancies of the rulers in Delhi .What we are witnessing today is the systematic disruption of our country’s federal structure both in letter and spirit.
“Paradoxically, the rulers in New Delhi have repeatedly flexed their muscles in areas where they should ideally be friendly and cooperative with the states. In order to do so they have not spared any constitutional office. There are many instances of states being targeted through the office of the Governor. Several other bodies are also being misused by the Centre to weaken the states ruled by the opposition in order to score political brownie points.
“Chief ministers are not consulted on crucial appointments. Rather appointments are being thrust down violating the spirit of the laws of the land. Why is it that chief ministers cutting across party lines are expressing serious apprehensions on these repeated attacks on India’s federal structure?”


Furthermore, it goes on:
”The systematic onslaught on the federal structure has taken various forms. The Gujarat Assembly thrice passed the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill but the centre has kept it waiting for four years now .This despite the fact that law and order is a matter clearly in the state list. What better to expect from a government that thrives on the evil of vote bank politics? Cooperative and not coercive federalism must be the norm in our country.”
Anguished outpourings of a concerned Indian at the state of present day affairs? No, excerpts from the blog of Narendra Modi, chief minister of Gujarat on the eve of Republic day, January 25, 2012!
The perceivably wronged became the triumphant ruler 18 months ago. What changed thereafter? Nothing, except that perverse politics has gone from bad to worse. The laudable conviction voiced in words has been proved sadistically hollow indeed. The previous government did it so we stand automatically licensed to pay back in kind and then add our own variation of interest to it, remains the norm of the Modi government.
Of course, Governors appointed by the previous administration have been pushed or snidely removed to be replaced by worthies of their own liking, in flagrant disregard of judicial pronouncements which state that constitutional appointees could not be so dispensed with before their term.
This is being done to destabilize opposition ruled states. The Congress-led government of Nabam Tuki in Arunachal Pradesh went for a toss, destabilized through engineered defections .Now it is the turn of another Congress opposition ruled state. The imposition of President’s rule in Uttarakhand invoking article 356 of the Constitution, just a day before the Harish Rawat government was set to face a trust vote leaves no scope of doubt on the coloured nature of the exercise by the Narendra Modi led Centre.
To add insult to injury, the Lok Sabha was prorogued to make sure that the state budget could be passed by executive order to by-pass the numerically stronger opposition in the Rajya Sabha where matters would have stalled.
Thus it is that the honourable gentleman who as chief minister of Gujarat took the moral high ground and flailed at the Manmohan Singh led UPA government for practicing coercive federalism today stands guilty of even baser political practices .It is plain subversion of the people’s mandate. How is Modi any better than the previous dispensation?
It is now abjectly clear that, having been thwarted in Bihar and Delhi, he has now decided to destabilize opposition-led state governments by the simple ruse of engineering defections and using pliable governors to install their own in power. Manipur and Himachal Pradesh are next on the list.
In fact in Manipur, the not so hidden BJP hand is already stoking dissidence against the Okram Ibobi Singh government. In Himachal work on sullying the image of Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh through numerous ‘official’ agencies has long been in the works so as to create grounds for an ’upsurge’ in dissidence and then the topple.
Deft hands are at work taking measured paces to sidestep the anti-defection law as well as the landmark 1994 SR Bommai case judgment of the Supreme Court which laid down the law that the majority of any government has to be tested on the floor of the House.
In Arunachal a smokescreen was promptly created through a trust motion against the Assembly Speaker. Importantly in both states the rebels lacked the numbers to by-pass the anti-defection law. The Modi government was fast on the uptake imposing President’s rule on the eve of a floor test. Where is the breakdown of Constitutional machinery? Why slyly subvert a popular mandate through the backdoor? Why not elections instead?
Because this is possible only after dissolution of the present House .The Upper House has to approve President’s rule. And if you need to avoid that then you need to ‘buy’ enough majority to stitch together an alternative government. This should make Modi’s compulsions clear enough.
And then there is union minister Venkaiah Naidu asking the Congress to introspect on why legislators are leaving their party! After describing his boss as God’s gift to India, he should know why. Obviously because of the filthy lucre raining from up there .Even in Bharat mata’s domain there is a price tag to every commodity, politicians included.
If cross-voting in the lowly Ahmedabad district panchayat in Gujarat recently, reportedly, carried a price tag of rupees two crores, imagine the transaction – cash or power— involved when the fate of entire state governments hang on breakaway votes.
Modi’s doublespeak is now a matter of social media jokes – and there are myriads of examples. But on a serious note this one takes the cake, for in hindsight, it stands out as a reflection of an important political persona who spoke flippantly and now in the hot seat has to eat his words.
On September 15, 2012, castigating the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, chief minister Modi said, ”By permitting foreign direct investment(FDI) in retail you are allowing foreign traders to enter India. The country wants to know how many Italian businessmen would benefit by this decision.”
Quoting Singh’s statement that he would rather go down fighting to push economic reforms, Modi had then said, and I quote, “Dr Manmohan Singh, you do not have the strength in your bones that you can die fighting. You have done it for the foreigners so that they can come here to conquer the trade of India and take away employment”.
Just an year after becoming the Prime Minister, on May 12,2015 Modi’s government retained Singh’s decision in its consolidated FDI policy. Would Prime Minister Modi now answer the question he had posed to Singh? Why and for whom?
And by the way, the GUJCOC which chief minister Modi had got thrice passed in the Gujarat Assembly was withdrawn from the President by Prime Minister Modi’s government.
In politics even pocket books can pose as almanacs!
---
*Senior Gandhinagar-based journalist. Blog: http://wordsmithsandnewsplumbers.blogspot.in/

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Modi wants Pak govt be held responsible for JeM terror strike: World doesn't agree

By Sandeep Pandey*
I went to participate in a candle light homage paying event at Dr BR Ambedkar's statue organised by about 200 Dalit students on Hazratganj main crossing in Lucknow on February 16, 2019 evening, two days after the dastardly terrorist act in Pulwana, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), in which 44 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel was killed.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.